What a Democrat-controlled SEC means for markets


An exterior view of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) headquarters in Washington.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

What would a Democrat-controlled Securities and Exchange Commission look like? It’s early, but speculation is already raging on Wall Street. 

Who will be SEC commissioner? Gary Gensler, who aggressively implemented the Dodd-Frank Act when he was the Obama administration’s chairman of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, is in charge of the Biden transition team’s review group of the Federal Reserve and banking and securities regulators, which would include the SEC. 

There are no obvious choices, but given that Democrats are historically aggressive on regulation to protect consumers and enforcement of those regulations, some feel it’s likely that a prosecutor-type would get serious consideration. 

“Inspections and enforcement actions will likely increase, because they have not been very high under the current administration,” said David Franasiak, an attorney with Williams & Jensen specializing in corporate law. 

(Note: according to the SEC, cases brought from 2017-2020 were about the same as those brought from 2013-2016, and examinations, on average, were greater during the 2017-2019 period than 2015-2016.)

Nick Morgan, a partner at Paul Hastings LLP and a former SEC senior trial counsel, told Law360 that “given Preet Bharara’s history with President Trump, he seems a likely candidate.” President Donald Trump fired Bharara as U.S. attorney in Manhattan in 2017 when he refused to resign.

Others agree that an “aggressive” candidate stood a good chance of approval.  “Maxine Waters is in charge of the House Financial Services Committee, and they (the Democrats) will look to her for regulatory guidance,” said Pat Healy of Issuer Advisory Network. “I think she will be a swing vote in who gets appointed.”

What would the SEC priorities be?

“You will see more climate-related and ESG related policies,” said Jim Angel, associate professor of finance at Georgetown University. “They will look at ESG disclosures, like climate and risk disclosure — how much carbon and greenhouse chemicals are you putting into the air?”

Indeed, expansion and standardization of environmental, social and governance principles was the most commonly referenced priority when I spoke with SEC watchers. More involvement in corporate governance, climate change, worker pay, worker treatment, diversity and health care.

SEC Commissioner Allison Herren-Lee, a Democrat who could be interim chair as a new chair is considered, has recently argued that the agency should consider standardized reporting by public companies and investment funds regarding climate risk. What does the SEC have to do with climate risk? In a recent speech to the Practicing Law Institute, Herren-Lee argued that the SEC is tasked with protecting investors, facilitating capital formation and maintaining fair, orderly and efficient markets. 

“Broadly, we must ensure that we work with fellow regulators to understand and, where appropriate, address systemic risks to our economy posed by climate change,” she said. “To assess systemic risk, we need complete, accurate, and reliable information about those risks,” which she said starts with public company disclosure.

She went on to encourage the development of more standardized disclosures around ESG in general.

To many observers the requirement to “disclose” risks around climate change masks a broader agenda:  “What is the goal here? Is it to get companies to disclose environmental risk, or is the goal to use disclosure requirements to require companies to take climate action?” one longtime SEC observer who asked to remain anonymous told me.

Another longtime observer, who also asked to remain anonymous, echoed that sentiment: “Disclosure is used as the hook. The way this is advanced is, ‘Oh, it’s just disclosure.’ And then if you don’t have a policy around, say, climate change or diversity, it becomes a shaming exercise for companies that don’t have procedures that fit with a certain line of thinking.”

“These are matters not germane to the SEC,” the same person went on to say.  “They are trying to bootstrap social agenda items into investor protection and disclosure, but it’s not the SEC’s role to solve these problems.”

A bigger push for public markets?

The SEC has recently moved to make it easier for some people to invest in private companies. Tyler Gellasch, executive director of Healthy Markets, said the Democrats will likely try to pull more companies — particularly large ones that have remained private for years — into the public markets.

“The SEC has been aggressive in expanding the pool of private markets, making it easier to raise money,” he said. “A huge part of the market has gone dark, in private equity hands. The Democrats would likely try to reverse those trends. They would say once you are a big enough company, you should be a public company. You can’t go through an endless round of fundraising to stay private.”

Regulation Best Interest

Regulation Best Interest, known as Reg BI, was a 2019 rule that required broker-dealers to recommend only financial products that were in their clients’ “best interest” but not require that they act as fiduciaries. 

That did not sit well with Democrats. “They don’t describe a fiduciary standard, but they would likely make everyone including brokers a fiduciary,” Franasiak said.

“The big fight is likely over compensation schemes,” Angel said. “The pro-fiduciary crowd [the Democrats] basically wanted to eliminate sales commissions, and said advice should either be charged by the hour, or as a percentage of assets under management. The anti-fiduciary crowd didn’t want to change anything, and realized that any new regulations would increase their compliance costs.”

Shareholder proposal rule

The SEC also recently adopted new rules for shareholder proposals. Under the old rule, a shareholder was required to have continuously held for one year at least $2,000 in market value, or 1% of a company’s voting securities, to be for inclusion in the proxy materials.

The new rule requires a shareholder to have continuously held voting securities with the following market values for these periods:

  • $2,000 for at least three years;
  • $15,000 for at least two years;
  • $25,000 for at least one year.

“The shareholder proposal rule is right up there with some of the regulations the Democrats would like to roll back,” said Chris Nagy, president and founder of KOR Trading, noting that both Democratic commissioners dissented from that proposal.

Don’t expect quick changes



Source link




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *